1.
My goals for writing this paper were to turn
this paper into a form of a dialogue. Include a cast of characters and myself
as well. I wanted to involve myself as a teacher giving a meeting to the
principals on why creativity is important. I think I pretty much reached my
goals, but working on my introduction with the characters can use a little
work. Maybe after workshop it will become better
2.
I used my time with developing this dialogue by
running through all my annotated bibliography that I said I was going to use to
show arguments. I underlined any useful information that could be possible for
me to use. I went back and then turned the arguments into main sources with viewpoints.
I used class time and Mrs. Keaton’s blog post she keeps herself to say what we
did in class, because I went back and really thought everything out the way she
said to do.
3.
I really didn’t see my writing change with this dialogue
yet, because I fully didn’t get the meaning if I’m doing this the right way or
not yet. We didn’t do peer revision for this one yet because it was our first
draft >? But when we do get in out blog groups for workshop I take every
advantage of advice I get to make corrections.
4.
No one contributed to my Rogerian dialogue yet
because I didn’t have any revisions done besides the ones I tried to pick up
on. I am going to print out my paper at school tomorrow and fix, take away, add
any mistakes I see with fresh eyes.
5.
I have learned about myself as a writer that I try
to express my ideas to quickly that I don’t get my meaning out to the reader in
the correct way. The way I talk reflects the way I write. I text and talk with
A LOT of slang which really hurts me when it comes down to a paper and writing.
I have learned from others that our minds all think differently, so the way we
hear and write something’s may look or sound fine to someone else, everyone has
a different tone to their writing from their own personality, which I think has
effects on writing some positive and some negative.
6.
I think the hardest part of writing this
dialogue is to actually write this into a form of a play, because I never done
this before and I’m not really good at it, which makes this assignment really difficult.
I think the easiest part of writing this dialogue was actually finding points
that are two arguments from my sources. Putting me as a character was really easy to
because I knew what I wanted to say and how to say it.
7.
I think I’m the most proud of my introduction. I
think this because I really explained BOTH sides this time the way I have been
trying to do the whole time. I really
tried to set a set for the reader to feel most comfortable with, which I think I
hit on the nail.
8.
I think my dialogue needs most improvement with
my characters and setting, of where the characters are in like a real play. I
really need to focus my characters and their arguments in the paly. I tried to
add some more descript words in the beginning to introduce the setting of me
being a teacher with my characters as two principals who need to take creativity
into consideration. But I feel like I just kept making the introduction longer.
9.
I have used my annotated bibliography as a
brainstorming piece for my Rogerian dialogue. I underlined any information that
was going to be useful in each of my sources. In class I would write down any
things that came to mind for this writing assignment. I came up with ideas and
a setting that I wanted my dialogue to take place in. I think I need more work
done on this but it’s my first draft, I want to be wright before wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment